<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Photos Of Naked Children Be Classified As Art?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/</link>
	<description>Exposing The BS Around The Globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:02:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-417</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-417</guid>
		<description>These apparently were only a sample of the photos, but what we must remember is the interest of the children and whether or not we as a society are over sexualising them. Tale for example a pedophile who was convicted for having photos of kids on his computer (not necessarily in a sexual act) does it make it OK for Henson&#039;s to be accepted just because he is well known and can put a $25,000 price tag on it.

If we let this one slip through, then what is next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These apparently were only a sample of the photos, but what we must remember is the interest of the children and whether or not we as a society are over sexualising them. Tale for example a pedophile who was convicted for having photos of kids on his computer (not necessarily in a sexual act) does it make it OK for Henson&#8217;s to be accepted just because he is well known and can put a $25,000 price tag on it.</p>
<p>If we let this one slip through, then what is next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 23:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Well, since these children are not engaged in a sexual act, and at least based on the photos I saw are not overtly sexually explicit, I must conclude that they do not qualify as porn, and are probably not abusive in nature, just entirely and ridiculously creepy. 

On the other hand, I don&#039;t know that they are signifciantly more creepy that Anne Geddes&#039;s Naked baby photos, and no one ever accuses her of pedophelia, so the question I would ask is how old does a child have to be before a photo of them naked automatically becomes porn, and how much older than that do they have to be before it&#039;s once again just a nakes photo?

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I find his pictures creepy, but I can&#039;t say that they should be criminalized, we already have seen enough cases of parents because some moron in the wal-mart photo lab reports them for having taken pictures of their kids the the bathtub.

Jonathans last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://inthelimelight.net/2008/05/25/dreams-and-intentions-will-get-you-nowhere-only-actions-can/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dreams And Intentions Will Get You Nowhere, Only Actions Can Create Reality&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since these children are not engaged in a sexual act, and at least based on the photos I saw are not overtly sexually explicit, I must conclude that they do not qualify as porn, and are probably not abusive in nature, just entirely and ridiculously creepy. </p>
<p>On the other hand, I don&#8217;t know that they are signifciantly more creepy that Anne Geddes&#8217;s Naked baby photos, and no one ever accuses her of pedophelia, so the question I would ask is how old does a child have to be before a photo of them naked automatically becomes porn, and how much older than that do they have to be before it&#8217;s once again just a nakes photo?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I find his pictures creepy, but I can&#8217;t say that they should be criminalized, we already have seen enough cases of parents because some moron in the wal-mart photo lab reports them for having taken pictures of their kids the the bathtub.</p>
<p>Jonathans last blog post..<a href="http://inthelimelight.net/2008/05/25/dreams-and-intentions-will-get-you-nowhere-only-actions-can/" >Dreams And Intentions Will Get You Nowhere, Only Actions Can Create Reality</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you on this one Kat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you on this one Kat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-375</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-375</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not over yet. They may decide it&#039;s OK an re-open. Hopefully not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not over yet. They may decide it&#8217;s OK an re-open. Hopefully not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbrian017</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>bbrian017</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-373</guid>
		<description>This is insane! What a bunch of fools! I&#039;m glad they made the management decision to raid the pace before it opened!

bbrian017s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogengage.com/story.php?title=The_Stock_Picking_Strategy_They_Dont_Want_You_To_Know_About&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Stock Picking Strategy They Don&#039;t Want You To Know About&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is insane! What a bunch of fools! I&#8217;m glad they made the management decision to raid the pace before it opened!</p>
<p>bbrian017s last blog post..<a href="http://www.blogengage.com/story.php?title=The_Stock_Picking_Strategy_They_Dont_Want_You_To_Know_About" >The Stock Picking Strategy They Don&#8217;t Want You To Know About</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Kat~</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/05/22/can-photos-of-naked-children-be-classified-as-art/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>~Kat~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=73#comment-372</guid>
		<description>That is not art and for anyone to say otherwise is insane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is not art and for anyone to say otherwise is insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
