<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is SocialSpark Being Too Selective?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/</link>
	<description>Exposing The BS Around The Globe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:02:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-219</guid>
		<description>What paid to blog site is offering those unrealistic tasks? I would even consider taking them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What paid to blog site is offering those unrealistic tasks? I would even consider taking them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManoDogs</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>ManoDogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Only just barely!  Recently, I received an offer that wanted me to link to the homepage &quot;and four or five interior pages&quot; in a 200-word &quot;positive &lt;em&gt;review&lt;/em&gt;&quot; (which doesn&#039;t even make sense) for $7.50!

Another &quot;opportunity&quot; was for 400 words, with 3 links (plus, they&#039;ll give you a higher rating if you add another of your choice and complete it within 2-3 days), along with a video and image for $5.00!!!

Ridiculous.

&lt;em&gt;ManoDogs&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RunDown/~3/272983302/norton-director-in-no-fight-over-hulks.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Norton, Director in No Fight Over Hulk&#039;s Direction&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only just barely!  Recently, I received an offer that wanted me to link to the homepage &#8220;and four or five interior pages&#8221; in a 200-word &#8220;positive <em>review</em>&#8221; (which doesn&#8217;t even make sense) for $7.50!</p>
<p>Another &#8220;opportunity&#8221; was for 400 words, with 3 links (plus, they&#8217;ll give you a higher rating if you add another of your choice and complete it within 2-3 days), along with a video and image for $5.00!!!</p>
<p>Ridiculous.</p>
<p><em>ManoDogs&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RunDown/~3/272983302/norton-director-in-no-fight-over-hulks.html' >Norton, Director in No Fight Over Hulk&#8217;s Direction</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-217</guid>
		<description>No biggy, there are plenty of other  fish in the blogosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No biggy, there are plenty of other  fish in the blogosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Well it looks like it didn&#039;t work because they have just accepted this blog but didn&#039;t leave a reply to the post. Not that I really care as I am making enough with those other blogs via the other Paid To Blog Sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it looks like it didn&#8217;t work because they have just accepted this blog but didn&#8217;t leave a reply to the post. Not that I really care as I am making enough with those other blogs via the other Paid To Blog Sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 05:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Bloody hell Manodogs, you must be blogging for the wrong people mate 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Now they want you to write 2,000-word dissertations,&lt;/blockquote&gt;. You are of course pulling my leg and are exaggerating like hell with those figure&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody hell Manodogs, you must be blogging for the wrong people mate </p>
<blockquote><p>Now they want you to write 2,000-word dissertations,</p></blockquote>
<p>. You are of course pulling my leg and are exaggerating like hell with those figure></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jude</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I agree with Danura that maybe they have new reviewers that aren&#039;t up to par yet. Of course people are trying to make money and I have seen so many blogs in their system already that look like that is the sole purpose for having a blog.

I find the response to your blog submissions ludicrous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Danura that maybe they have new reviewers that aren&#8217;t up to par yet. Of course people are trying to make money and I have seen so many blogs in their system already that look like that is the sole purpose for having a blog.</p>
<p>I find the response to your blog submissions ludicrous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan...</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-207</guid>
		<description>ahhh...the old hit &#039;em with a post instead of a ticket trick.  Hopefully you&#039;ll get some answers one way or another.

One aspect of SocialSpark I like, is that getting approved for sponsored posts is just a piece of what the platform offers.  Just as MyBlogLog and Compete don&#039;t &#039;approve&#039; your blog for sponsored posts, but still provide value to bloggers for social networking and analytics.  SocialSpark&#039;s social networking and analytics provide value to any blogger, whether sponsored blogging is involved or not.

&lt;em&gt;Dan...&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.floridaventureblog.com/2008/04/socialspark-launches-do-you-smell-what.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SocialSpark Launches: Do You Smell What the Spark is Cooking?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ahhh&#8230;the old hit &#8216;em with a post instead of a ticket trick.  Hopefully you&#8217;ll get some answers one way or another.</p>
<p>One aspect of SocialSpark I like, is that getting approved for sponsored posts is just a piece of what the platform offers.  Just as MyBlogLog and Compete don&#8217;t &#8216;approve&#8217; your blog for sponsored posts, but still provide value to bloggers for social networking and analytics.  SocialSpark&#8217;s social networking and analytics provide value to any blogger, whether sponsored blogging is involved or not.</p>
<p><em>Dan&#8230;&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.floridaventureblog.com/2008/04/socialspark-launches-do-you-smell-what.html' >SocialSpark Launches: Do You Smell What the Spark is Cooking?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManoDogs</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>ManoDogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-206</guid>
		<description>I got the very same message, Sire.  I wrote them a fairly long and very critical response in the ticket submit place.

I&#039;m getting fed-up with these sponsored post networks, anyway; what started out as a great thing - being able to make $5-10 for a 50-word post that basically said, &quot;Check this site out if you need snow tires&quot; or whatever - has turned into organized spamming for peanuts.  Now they want you to write 2,000-word dissertations, including 3-10 links to their casino, credit card,  and sex aids site for the same amount of money!

And 90% of the new blogs they allow in now are nothing &lt;em&gt;but&lt;/em&gt; splogs!  They are specifically created to take advantage of these sponsored networks and have nothing but one sponsored post after the next!

I hate to admit it, but if Google had decided to knock PR from blogs &lt;em&gt;today&lt;/em&gt;, I would completely understand it!  Still, I think what happened is that Google forced their hand and it led to this.  Still, these networks need to clean their act up.

&lt;em&gt;ManoDogs&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RunDown/~3/271687768/x-files-i-want-to-believe.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;X-Files: I Want to Believe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the very same message, Sire.  I wrote them a fairly long and very critical response in the ticket submit place.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting fed-up with these sponsored post networks, anyway; what started out as a great thing &#8211; being able to make $5-10 for a 50-word post that basically said, &#8220;Check this site out if you need snow tires&#8221; or whatever &#8211; has turned into organized spamming for peanuts.  Now they want you to write 2,000-word dissertations, including 3-10 links to their casino, credit card,  and sex aids site for the same amount of money!</p>
<p>And 90% of the new blogs they allow in now are nothing <em>but</em> splogs!  They are specifically created to take advantage of these sponsored networks and have nothing but one sponsored post after the next!</p>
<p>I hate to admit it, but if Google had decided to knock PR from blogs <em>today</em>, I would completely understand it!  Still, I think what happened is that Google forced their hand and it led to this.  Still, these networks need to clean their act up.</p>
<p><em>ManoDogs&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/RunDown/~3/271687768/x-files-i-want-to-believe.html' >X-Files: I Want to Believe</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS Artist</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>BS Artist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan, yes I could do that mate, or I could just wait until they see this post and get their reaction. I say this because I have submitted this blog for SocialSpark and I reckon they will see this post before any ticket that I submit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan, yes I could do that mate, or I could just wait until they see this post and get their reaction. I say this because I have submitted this blog for SocialSpark and I reckon they will see this post before any ticket that I submit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan...</title>
		<link>http://www.loadofbullshit.com/2008/04/16/is-socialspark-being-too-selective/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loadofbullshit.com/?p=43#comment-201</guid>
		<description>@all: if the extent of your sponsorships is as you mention (e.g. just PPP), I&#039;d suggest resubmitting and/or opening a ticket with explanation.  SocialSpark added reviewers as part of the launch and I bet some are still coming up to speed...

&lt;em&gt;Dan...&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.floridaventureblog.com/2008/04/socialspark-launches-do-you-smell-what.html&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SocialSpark Launches: Do You Smell What the Spark is Cooking?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@all: if the extent of your sponsorships is as you mention (e.g. just PPP), I&#8217;d suggest resubmitting and/or opening a ticket with explanation.  SocialSpark added reviewers as part of the launch and I bet some are still coming up to speed&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Dan&#8230;&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.floridaventureblog.com/2008/04/socialspark-launches-do-you-smell-what.html' >SocialSpark Launches: Do You Smell What the Spark is Cooking?</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
